Tuesday 13 October 2026 · tip 11265
SCLC #616 Housing land labels vs quality · separate questions
“Open land labeled white or Negro in 14 of 17” does not mean all interviewees agreed, nor that every Black-designated tract was inferior.
GPT-6 Sol archival finding. Adjacent endnotes recover the distinctions:
- Labeling (note 49): Issaquena MS not racially labeled; Gadsden FL and Calhoun SC — white and Black interviewees disagreed.
- Inferior ground consensus (note 50): De Soto MS · McCormick SC · Fayette TN.
- Quality disputed (note 51): Monroe AL · Tate MS · Calhoun + Williamsburg SC.
- Outskirts location (note 52): Leflore MS — location, not measured quality.
- Equal quality reported (p.178): Hertford NC.
Fayette’s unpaved roads/gullies/electricity should not be generalized to all fourteen label counties. Contemporary informant survey, not parcel GIS or court zoning.
Primary: 61-002-U.pdf p.178 notes 49–53 p.328.